SELENIUM POPUP WINDOW INSTALL
One limitation is that you need visual studio installed on the client where you execute your tests (but you can use a visual studio test client install as well if you have licenses for it). MSTEST is the command line version of the built in test harness for visual studio. Unless you want to really get crazy, either should have everything you need for the purposes of executing your automated tests. Really MSTEST and NUNIT have pretty much equivalent functionality. I am using Selenium 2/Webdriver with Visual Studio and MSTEST. GetUserwhich is likely to be generated from a variety of controllers in several locations.Creating CookieStorage We have encapsulated the logic of working with the bows in one place and can make agreed changes. By method StoreUser I need to write a couple.
SELENIUM POPUP WINDOW HOW TO
StoreUser Virtual, we can use it as a jackass.This is where we get a case where testing suggests how to improve the system design. _cookieStorage.StoreUser(Request.Cookie, userName, account.ExternalId) īecause we did the method. Method Login It'll look like,public async Task Login(string userName) LoginController You can use the designer. Public virtual void StoreUser(HttpCookie cookie, string name, string id) The logic of the folding and extraction of user data in the cuisine can be taken in a very separate class:public class CookieStorage This happened, too, because we overloaded our controller. To test this code, we'll gather everything we already know:var controllerMock = new Mock(db.Object) ĬontrollerMock.Setup(x => x.StoreUserInCookies("john doe", It.IsAny()) Īwait ("john doe") Public virtual void StoreUserInCookies(string username, string externalId) StoreUserInCookied(userName, account.ExternalId) Var account = await _db.FindByUserNameAsync(userName) Adding LoginController Method:public async Task Login(string userName) Three.We'll get rid of direct dependence. Not yours, you can't change it.Use the way. If you're in the process of developing a library to cover her tests, all such incorrect properties and methods are coming up quickly.
SELENIUM POPUP WINDOW CODE
What happens in this case?If the code is yours, you can make it virtual. Request nonvirtual, and we can't change it. CallBase♪ Sovereignty Request return the value.It's kind of a good option, but by looking at the documentation, we're finding out that the properties are characteristic. Non-virtual methods will be generated as before.
We need some of the methods for the tests, and we have to clearly list them:controllerMock.SetupGet(x => x.Request)
If there was a method Login was virtual, we couldn't test him.In this case, we should ask the library to call. Requestbut also redefines all other virtual methods. There's a problem here: Moq redefines the properties. two: If it's only for reading, but it's virtual, Moq's library can be its Reassignment♪var controllerMock = new Mock(db.Object) This method won't work in our case, because the properties Request Just for reading. Requestit can be tested in several ways.Method number Oneif characteristic Request Public and variable, we can determine his meaning before the test.var controller = new LoginController(db.Object) Ĭontroller.Request = new HttpRequest account♪UPDATEI'm writing the answer after the comment. Any value shall be recorded as It.IsAny():db.Setup(repo => repo.FindByUserNameAsync(It.IsAny())).ReturnsAsync(account) Īfter this change, the method will be set at any parameter value and return the existing value. In this case, any stringency may be brought into line, as the method will be summoned exactly once and we will not have several options. If you want to put the specific value in line, you can pass it as a parameter. FindByUserNameAsynс with certain parameters to return a certain meaning. Here you're asking for Moq's library on call. Looks like it's in the line:db.Setup(repo => repo.FindByUserNameAsync(userName)).ReturnsAsync(account)
0 kommentar(er)
